State v. McCuin
Cited by
- State v. Pry 562 P.3d 885 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena Trujillo 462 P.3d 550 Ariz. 2020
- State v. Healer 440 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
- State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Trujillo 430 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
- State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey Ariz. 2017
- State of Arizona v. Craig Victor Coleman 385 P.3d 420 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey 381 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Musselman v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State of Arizona v. Stephen Vincent Haverstick 318 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Noble 829 P.2d 1217
- State v. McCuin 167 Ariz. 447
Opinion text
OPINION FELDMAN, Chief Justice. The facts of this case are set forth in our opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171 , 829 P.2d 1217 (1992), and in the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. McCuin, 167 Ariz. 447 , 808 P.2d 332 (Ct.App.1991). For the reasons given in our opinion today in Noble , the trial court judgment is affirmed, and part IV of the court of appeals’ opinion is vacated. MOELLER, V.C.J., CORCORAN, J., FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., J. (retired), and CARRUTH, Judge, concur. JAMES DUKE CAMERON, J. (retired), did not participate in this matter; pursuant to article 6, § 3 of the Arizona Constitution, JAMES C. CARRUTH, Judge, of the Pima County Superior Court was designated to sit in his stead.