Cited by

& Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co., )); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).

(stating that an argument not sufficiently developed on appeal is waived).

¶60 Additionally, parties are “entitled to an instruction on any theory of the case reasonably supported by the evidence.”

¶ 15 (App. 2010) (concluding error in admitting prior convictions as impeachment evidence was harmless where the evidence showed the defendant was interrupted in the course of the crime and later admitted the elements of the crimes of which he was convicted); (concluding error in admitting prior convictions as impeachment evidence was harmless when the defendant’s testimony “was wholly independent of his prior convictions and was at least as damaging to him as evidence of those convictions”) ¶9

(distinguishing Pool because “the prosecutor here did not call defendant pejorative names, refer to matters not in evidence, suggest unfavorable matter for which no proof exists, or abuse defendant in any other way”).

“The decision to refuse a jury instruction is within the trial court’s discretion, and this court will not reverse it absent a clear abuse of that discretion.” ¶ 4 (App. 2006) ().

Id.; (finding claims waived for insufficient argument on appeal).

¶8 To require reversal on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct, “the conduct must have been so pronounced and persistent that it permeated the entire trial and probably affected the outcome.” (citation omitted).

(within trial court’s discretion to refuse jury instruction); ¶ 12 (App. 2015) (denial of motion for new trial based on purported duplicitous charge generally reviewed for abuse of discretion).

3 STATE v. MARKS Decision of the Court ¶8 “The decision to refuse a jury instruction is within the trial court’s discretion, and this court will not reverse it absent a clear abuse of that discretion.” (citation omitted).

The comments were not “so egregious that [they] permeated the entire trial and probably affected the outcome.”

¶11 We review a trial court’s decision regarding the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion, ¶ 29 (2004), and likewise review a trial court’s decision to withhold a jury instruction

(claims not supported by argument or citation to the record are waived).

ce due to outrageous pretrial publicity," State v. Bible , , 564, , 1167 (1993), because of the defendant's extremely heavy burden to show "the publicity [is] 'so unfair, so prejudicial, and so pervasive that [the trial court] cannot give any credibility to the jurors' answers during voir dire,' " Cruz , 218 Ariz. at 157 ¶ 15, 181 P.3d at 204 (quoting State v. Bolton , , 300, , 840 (1995) ); accord Bible , 175 Ariz. at 564 -65 , 858 P.2d at 1167 -68 .

State v. Bolton , , 309, , 849 (1995).

§ 13-4071 does not specify that grand jury subpoenas are invalid if these reporting obligations are not met, and the statute does not specify a v. Bolton, ¶ 33 (App. 2011).

(“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”) (citations omitted).

¶ 22 (2005); (holding that an objection on one ground does not preserve an issue on another ground).

(providing that failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim).