Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bolton, 896 P.2d 830.

497 citing documents.

State v. Samuels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(failure to develop legal argument waives argument on review); (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
Maria Carmen Zubia v. David Shapiro Ariz. 2018
Maria Carmen Zubia v. David Shapiro Ariz. 2018
¶ 46 n.8 (2003) (failure to develop a legal argument constitutes waiver of that argument on appeal), opinion supplemented by (“Failure to [sufficiently] argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Godoy 418 P.3d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Godoy 418 P.3d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
See State v. Bolton , , 298, , 838 (1995).
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 22 (2005); (holding that an objection on one ground does not preserve an issue on another ground).
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶14 Moreover, a defendant who presents a defense following the denial of a Rule 20 motion “waives any error if his case supplies evidence missing in the state’s case.”
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Molinar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 22; (objection on one ground does not preserve objection on another ground).
State v. Heitzmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Heitzmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(insufficient argument waives claim on review); (finding petition for review incorporating trial court filings “utterly fails to comply with Rule 32.9” and therefore summarily rejecting claims raised).
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 11 (App. 2011) (failing to develop argument usually results in waiver on appeal); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Luke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(recognizing that an insufficient argument waives a claim on review), abrogation on other grounds recognized by McKinney v. Ryan, 813 F.3d 798, 815-16 (9th Cir. 2015); (“Petitioners must strictly comply with Rule 32 or be de
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”); (issues waived on appeal cannot be resurrected in later post-conviction proceeding).
Floyd R. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Floyd R. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(holding appeals court will not consider arguments not raised below unless it is a matter of fundamental error).
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
("Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
State v. R.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. R.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(noting that an objection on one ground does not preserve a claim of error on another ground) ( -07 (App. 1991)).
State v. Gurrieri Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gurrieri Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Additionally, a defendant who presents a defense following the denial of a Rule 20 motion “waives any error if his case supplies evidence missing in the state’s case.”
In Re J.U. 384 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re J.U. 384 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Ct. 106(A) (applying ARCAP 13 to juvenile appeals); (claims waived for insufficient argument on appeal).
State of Arizona v. Javier Francisco Navarro 382 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Javier Francisco Navarro 382 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
4 STATE v. NAVARRO Opinion of the Court ¶7 Questions concerning the validity of Navarro’s consent and the applicability of the good-faith exception are consequently irrelevant to the constitutional issue raised on appe
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 379 P.3d 197 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle 379 P.3d 197 Ariz. 2016
-98 , -38 (1996) (constitutional issues not raised or adequately argued below are waived absent fundamental error).
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle Ariz. 2016
- 98, -38 (1995) (constitutional issues not raised or adequately argued below are waived absent fundamental error).
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Maez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Maez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh Jurden 373 P.3d 543 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh Jurden 373 P.3d 543 Ariz. 2016
State v. Birchett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Birchett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that denial of Willits instruction was appropriate for destruction of taxicab which had been extensively photographed and tested, with results provided to defense counsel); (holding that proof of the absence of finge
State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter Foshay 370 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter Foshay 370 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix 371 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016