Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bolton, 896 P.2d 830.
-
State v. Birchett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that denial of Willits instruction was appropriate for destruction of taxicab which had been extensively photographed and tested, with results provided to defense counsel); (holding that proof of the absence of finge
- State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter Foshay 370 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
-
State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter Foshay
370 P.3d 618
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
- Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix 371 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
-
Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix
371 P.3d 654
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
(insufficient argument on appeal waives claim).
- State v. McKnelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. McKnelly
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sanitization exists to prevent the jury from unfairly inferring that because the defendant previously committed a similar offense “he probably did so this time.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
- State v. Quimayousie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Quimayousie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Peraza 366 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Peraza 366 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Stevens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶¶ 19-20, (waiver principle applies to both constitutional and non-constitutional issues) (citations omitted).
- State v. Sumpter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Sumpter
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 90, We cite the current version of the applicable statutes because no revisions material to this decision have occurred since the date of the offense.
- State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West 362 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West
362 P.3d 1049
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
- State of Arizona v. Rusty James Driscoll 361 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Rusty James Driscoll
361 P.3d 961
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
3 (failure to argue issue on appeal waives review of issue).
- State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Rivera
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
You bet, Mr. Bolton,” may have been “argumentative.” -08, -48 (1995).
- State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State of Arizona v. Ronald Vassell 359 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- State of Arizona v. Ronald Vassell 359 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State of Arizona v. Shawn Patrick Lynch 357 P.3d 119 Ariz. 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Shawn Patrick Lynch
357 P.3d 119
Ariz. 2015
(“The questioning may have been argumentative.
- State v. Loader Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Loader Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray 355 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray
355 P.3d 621
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(insufficient argument waives claim on review).
- State v. McPherson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. McPherson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (argument shall contain “citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”); (issue waived when argument insufficient to permit appellate review).
- State v. Turner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Turner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 19, (holding that objection on grounds of lack of foundation and speculation did not preserve objection that admission of evidence violated confrontation right).
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela 350 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela
350 P.3d 811
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (argument in brief shall include “citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”)
- State v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Solis 339 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Solis 339 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014