Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bolton, 896 P.2d 830.

497 citing documents.

State v. Dorsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(insufficient argument on appeal waives claim).
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(argument not developed on appeal waived).
State v. Valenzuela-Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Valenzuela-Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. David J. Waller 333 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. David J. Waller 333 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(insufficient argument waives claim on review).
State of Arizona v. Crispin Granados Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Crispin Granados Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (argument “shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”); (“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”).
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 329 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 329 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2014
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“The decision to refuse a jury instruction is within the trial court’s discretion, and this court will not reverse it absent a clear abuse of that discretion.”
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Antone Alex Gill 319 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Antone Alex Gill 319 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (opening brief must include “[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”); (finding waiver due to insufficient argument on appeal).
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez 308 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez 308 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (opening brief “shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, 5 statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (inadequate argument on appeal waives issue).
State of Arizona v. Craig Michael Stefanovich 302 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Craig Michael Stefanovich 302 P.3d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
P. 32.9(c)(1)(iv) (petition for review shall contain “reasons why the petition should be granted”); (claims waived for insufficient argument on appeal); (to warrant evidentiary hearing, Rule 32 claim “must consist of more than conclusory assertions”).
State of Arizona v. Steven John Parker 296 P.3d 54 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Steven John Parker 296 P.3d 54 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. James Lee Hess 290 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Ronnie Lovelle Joseph 283 P.3d 27 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Gilbert Martinez 282 P.3d 409 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Gilbert Martinez 282 P.3d 409 Ariz. 2012
(“Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”) Nonetheless we review the preclusion of impeachment for fundamental error because if a defendant is deprived of the chance
State of Arizona v. Ronnie Lovelle Joseph 283 P.3d 27 Ariz. 2012
3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
State v. Pete J. Vanwinkle 285 P.3d 308 Ariz. 2012
3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
State of Arizona v. Francisco Antonio Lopez 279 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Francisco Antonio Lopez 279 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi); (issue waived when argument insufficient to permit appellate review).
State of Arizona v. James Darrell Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. James Darrell Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(“[a]rgument must be in the body of the brief,” and text in appendix stricken), P.2d 762 (1996); State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. 290, 298, (argument not within body of brief procedurally defaulted).
State v. Bigger 254 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bigger 254 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
State of Arizona v. Michael Lorenzo Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Michael Lorenzo Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (issue waived when argument insufficient to permit appellate review).
State of Arizona v. Daniel Oliveri Michael Joseph Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Miller 245 P.3d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Daniel Oliveri Michael Joseph Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi); (issue waived when argument insufficient to permit appellate review).
State v. Miller 245 P.3d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
P. 31.13(e)(1)(vi); , (issue waived when argument insufficient to permit appel *193 late review).