Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bolton, 896 P.2d 830.

497 citing documents.

Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC. 237 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC. 237 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Villalobos 235 P.3d 227 Ariz. 2010
State v. Villalobos 235 P.3d 227 Ariz. 2010
n.6, n.6 (1995) (evaluating child’s defenselessness as part of (F)(6) aggravator).
State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010
State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010
State of Arizona v. Maxamilano Paredes-Solano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Maxamilano Paredes-Solano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Generally, a party is entitled to an instruction on any theory reasonably supported by the evidence, unless “‘its substance is adequately covered by other instructions,’ or it is an incorrect statement of law,” quoting verdict,’” we find them instructive here.
State v. Kiles 213 P.3d 174 Ariz. 2009
State v. Kiles 213 P.3d 174 Ariz. 2009
Rejected by Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 648 (1990)
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
§ 13-1303(A); see State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. - 9 - 290, 309
State v. Fish 213 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Fish 213 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(“A party is entitled to an instruction on any theory of the case reasonably supported by the evidence.”); , (same).
Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pipher v. Loo 212 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pipher v. Loo 212 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Gurrola 199 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Gurrola 199 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
("Failure to argue a claim on appeal constitutes waiver of that claim.”); see also Ariz. R.Crim.
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
applies when a defendant fails to object to alleged trial error.”); (“waiver principle applies to alleged constitutional issues, as well as to nonconstitutional issues”); (doctrine of waiver “applies to constitutional error”); (App. 2
State of Arizona v. Sergio Alonzo Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Sergio Alonzo Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Anthony 189 P.3d 366 Ariz. 2008
State v. Anthony 189 P.3d 366 Ariz. 2008
¶39 “Error, be it constitutional or otherwise, is harmless if we can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict.” Bible, 175 Ariz. at 588, 858 P.2d at 1191
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
State v. Martinez 189 P.3d 348 Ariz. 2008
24 ¶49 “A trial court’s refusal to give a jury instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Anderson II, 210 Ariz. at 343, ¶ 60, 111 P.3d at 385 (citing State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. 290, 309, ).
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
- 5 - a. Presumed prejudice ¶15 For prejudice to be presumed, the publicity must be “so unfair, so prejudicial, and so pervasive that [the court] cannot give any credibility to the jurors’ answers during voir dire.” (quoting Bible, 175 Ariz. at 565, 858 P.2d at 1168) (alteration in Bolton).
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
State v. Harrod 183 P.3d 519 Ariz. 2008
This claim has been rejected by Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 651-52 (1990), overruled on other grounds, Ring II, 536 U.S. 584; State v. Miles, 186 Ariz. 10, 19
State v. Fernandez 169 P.3d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Fernandez 169 P.3d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Velazquez 166 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2007
State v. Velazquez 166 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2007
Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 648 (1990), overruled on other grounds by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 609 (2002)
State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007
State v. Garza 163 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2007
see also Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 653 (1990).
State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Gary Edward Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. 290, 309
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
“The decision to refuse a jury instruction is within the trial court’s discretion, and this court will not reverse it absent a clear abuse of that discretion.”
State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
State v. Johnson 133 P.3d 735 Ariz. 2006
State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State of Arizona v. Renee Sue Ruggiero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Renee Sue Ruggiero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005
State v. Anderson 111 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2005