Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bolton, 896 P.2d 830.

497 citing documents.

State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
State v. Barraza 104 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Barraza 104 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
(an issue not raised with the trial court is waived absent fundamental error).
State of Arizona v. Daniel James Alexander Barnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Daniel James Alexander Barnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
We do not address this issue, however, both because the state did not raise it in the trial court, P.2d 830 (1995) (appellate court will not consider issue not raised below), and because the record is inadequate for such a review.
State of Arizona v. Richard Emanuel Ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Richard Emanuel Ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
P.2d 830 (1995) (appellate court will only consider matter not raised below if it constitutes fundamental error).
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
(“On appeal we will consider a matter not raised below only if it is a matter of fundamental error.”); , (finding that because a defendant failed to raise in the trial court either federal or state constitutional claims that h
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
306 n. 5, , 846 n. 5 (1995).
State v. Garfield 92 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Garfield 92 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
We review a trial court’s refusal to give a proffered jury instruction for an abuse of discretion, , and will not reverse a trial court’s refusal unless the defendant suffered prejudice as a result.
State v. Secord 88 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Secord 88 P.3d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
*523 (1995) (“Motions for mistrial based on prose-cutorial misconduct are committed to the trial court’s discretion, which will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly abused.”); , (appellate court defers to trial court’s fi
State v. Smyers 86 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2004
State v. Smyers 86 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2004
____________________________________ Ruth V. McGregor, Vice Chief Justice 3 Although Smyers is precluded from challenging the trial court’s pretrial ruling, we reemphasize that “a trial court should sparingly admit evidence of prior convictions when the prior convictions are similar to the charged offense.”
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
See State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. 290, 297-98, -38 (1995).
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. Huerstel 75 P.3d 698 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. Huerstel 75 P.3d 698 Ariz. 2003
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
See Jammal v. Van de Kamp, 926 F.2d 918 (9th Cir.1991); (failure to develop legal argument waives argument on appeal).
State v. Smyers 73 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Smyers 73 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 10 When reviewing a ruling on the admissibility of a prior conviction, this court will reverse the trial court's determination if the court abused its discretion, , , or if it committed an error of law.
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Because he did not challenge § 13- 501(E) below, Rodriguez has waived this argument on appeal.6 See State v. Bolton, 182 Ariz. 290, 297
State v. Beasley 70 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Beasley 70 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Watkins, 133 Ariz. at 2-3 , 648 P.2d at 117-18 .
State v. Rutledge 66 P.3d 50 Ariz. 2003
State v. Rutledge 66 P.3d 50 Ariz. 2003
see also Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 648 [, 110 S.Ct.
State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Allen Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Allen Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Mitchell 62 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Mitchell 62 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002