Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spears, 908 P.2d 1062.

324 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra 366 P.3d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Uriarte-Velazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Uriarte-Velazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Meyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Hudson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Dickenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Dickenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Hudson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(finding that “I’m not going to say anymore until I talk to a lawyer” was unequivocal).
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Morago Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Morago Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶9 We review a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress based solely on the evidence presented at the suppression hearing, and we view that evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling, ¶ 4 (App. 2007).
State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Gomez-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See supra, at ¶ 18 n.3; (stating that in reviewing a motion for new trial, court must “view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and [] resolve all inferences against the defendant.”); (same).
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
3 STATE v. DAVIS Decision of the Court reasonable doubt.”
State v. Zamorano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Zamorano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Garth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Garth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Ochoa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ochoa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hafen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hafen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Probable Cause ¶ 8 “Probable cause to conduct a search exists when ‘a reasonably prudent person, based upon the facts known by the officer, would be justified in concluding that the items sought are connected with criminal activity and that they would be found at the place to be searched.’ ”
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress, this court looks only at the evidence presented to the trial court during the suppression hearing.”).
State v. Davignon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Davignon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Medina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Medina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sandoval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015