Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Soto-Fong, 928 P.2d 610.

288 citing documents.

Cardona v. Ivory Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Cardona v. Ivory Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Juniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Juniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ¶ 109 (2022) ().
State v. Works Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Works Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
This is because “the jury has a right to know any fact which tends to show a witness is biased, prejudiced or hostile in passing on that witness’ credibility.” (cleaned up); –98 (1996).
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Strover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Strover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(recognizing that the jury, not a reviewing court, determines whether evidence is credible (citation omitted)).
State v. Royalty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Royalty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 109 (2022) (cleaned up); ("This court is not empowered to impose its own determination as to the credibility of [witnesses] in deciding a Rule 20 motion.").
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(when reviewing witness testimony, this court does not determine credibility).
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶30 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
State v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Evidence sufficient to support a conviction can be direct or circumstantial,” Snider, and we reverse on insufficiency of evidence “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” Sharma, 216 Ariz. at 294, ¶ 7 ().
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
And reversal “occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Schoenhardt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Schoenhardt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
403; (“The trial judge is afforded discretion to determine whether the probative value of relevant evidence is substantially outweighed by .
State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
This court overturns a conviction when “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004) ().
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only [when] there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tingue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stated differently, “[r]eversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only whe[n] there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
State v. Tingue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stated differently, “[r]eversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only whe[n] there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stated differently, “[r]eversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020