Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Soto-Fong, 928 P.2d 610.

288 citing documents.

State v. De Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. De Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(stating credibility of witnesses and weight to be afforded evidence are issues to be resolved by the jury).
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
State v. Hickey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Criticized State v. Hickey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(recognizing that we do not reweigh evidence on appeal).
State v. Amman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Amman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm unless there is a “complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Best Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Best Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm unless there is a “complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (- 25 (1976)).
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-21, ¶ 10 (App. 2014) ().
State v. Burgess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burgess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bieganski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bieganski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1973)).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶20 When the evidence supporting a verdict is challenged on appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence, ¶ 9 (App. 2013); ¶ 6 (App. 2004), or determine the credibility of witnesses, Williams, 209 Ariz. at 231, ¶ 6; (“This court is not empowered to impose its own determination as to the credibility of [witnesses] in deciding a Rule 20 motion.”).
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(“Evidence is not insubstantial simply because testimony is conflicting or reasonable persons may draw different conclusions from the evidence.”).
State v. Castillejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Castillejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
We will reverse a case based on insufficient evidence if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶15 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)) (emphasis added).
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sanford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sanford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(credibility of a witness is solely a matter for the fact finder; court is not empowered to impose its own determination as to a witness’ credibility).
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Escalante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Escalante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Battle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Battle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdenegro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017