DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Soto-Fong, 928 P.2d 610.

288 citing documents.

  • State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Valdenegro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel Hidalgo 390 P.3d 783 Ariz. 2017
  • State of Arizona v. Abel Daniel Hidalgo 390 P.3d 783 Ariz. 2017
    “The specified statutory aggravators in Arizona’s death penalty scheme are designed to narrow, in a constitutional manner, the class of first degree murderers who are death- eligible.”
  • State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶14 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation 5 STATE v. RODRIGUEZ Decision of the Court omitted).
  • State v. Vega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Vega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Cox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation and quotation omitted).
  • State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    3 STATE v. VALLEJOS Decision of the Court of probative facts to support the conviction.” (quotation and citation omitted).
  • State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    3 STATE v. COFFELT Decision of the Court insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Jernigan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Jernigan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶8 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the denial of a Rule 20 motion and the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction de novo, Harm, 236 Ariz. at 406, ¶ 11 ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (citation omitted); (“[I]t must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted)).
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Mungia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Mungia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Reversal is warranted only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
  • State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    4 STATE v. BALLESTEROS Decision of the Court facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Petersen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Petersen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Drew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Drew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State v. Lombardo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Hassan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015