Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Soto-Fong, 928 P.2d 610.

288 citing documents.

  • State v. Lombardo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Hassan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Reversible error based on insufficient evidence “occurs only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
  • State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    ¶4 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (- 25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Cornman 351 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Cornman 351 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” , (citation omitted).
  • State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ( STATE v. CORTEZ Decision of the Court 424-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    8 STATE v. HENDERSON Decision of the Court ¶28 “Reversible error based upon insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr. 338 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr. 338 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based 3 STATE v. CARRIER Decision of the Court on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See State v. Soto–Fong, (“’Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.’”) (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Andrus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Andrus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶9 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ―Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a 3 STATE v. CARDENAS-SALCIDO Decision of the Court complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.‖ (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Ohanlon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Ohanlon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Hiemstra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Hiemstra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
  • State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
  • State v. Large 321 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Large 321 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” , (-25 , -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    3 STATE v. WOODS Decision of the Court only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶5 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014