Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Soto-Fong, 928 P.2d 610.
-
State v. Lombardo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
-
State v. Hassan
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Reversible error based on insufficient evidence “occurs only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
- State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Hayes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶4 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Ludwig
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (- 25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Cornman 351 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Cornman
351 P.3d 357
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” , (citation omitted).
- State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Felix
349 P.3d 1117
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
- State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Satovich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
- State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Cortez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ( STATE v. CORTEZ Decision of the Court 424-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Henderson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
8 STATE v. HENDERSON Decision of the Court ¶28 “Reversible error based upon insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
- State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr. 338 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. George Anthony Dominguez Jr. 338 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Carrier
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based 3 STATE v. CARRIER Decision of the Court on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
- State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Maestas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
- State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Humelhans
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See State v. Soto–Fong, (“’Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.’”) (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Krentiras
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Andrus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Andrus
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶9 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Cardenas-Salcido
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
―Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a 3 STATE v. CARDENAS-SALCIDO Decision of the Court complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.‖ (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Ohanlon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Ohanlon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Hiemstra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Hiemstra
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”
- State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Smith
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Leyba
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
- State v. Large 321 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Large
321 P.3d 439
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” , (-25 , -19 (1976)).
- State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Woods
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 STATE v. WOODS Decision of the Court only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Craft
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶5 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (citation omitted).
-
State v. Gallegos
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
- State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
- State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014