Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lee, 944 P.2d 1204.

176 citing documents.

State v. Termini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Termini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.” ¶ 7 (App. 2023) ().
State v. L & L Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. L & L Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the [superior court] has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Valenzuela Arella Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Valenzuela Arella Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the [superior court] judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Betrue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Betrue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Harper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the [superior court] has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.” (citation omitted).
State v. Quarles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Quarles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Welvaert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Welvaert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Jamison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Jamison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“When the evidence supporting a verdict is challenged on appeal, an appellate court will not reweigh the evidence.”).
State v. Najim Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Najim Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(noting appellate courts do not reweigh the evidence or resolve inferences in a defendant’s favor).
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“When the evidence supporting a verdict is challenged on appeal, an appellate court will not reweigh the evidence.
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“When reasonable minds may differ on inferences drawn from the facts, the case must be submitted to the jury, and the trial judge has no discretion to enter a judgment of acquittal.”