Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spreitz, 945 P.2d 1260.

191 citing documents.

State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
¶ 66 “[A]ny photograph of the deceased m any murder case is relevant to assist a jury to understand an issue because the fact and cause of death are always relevant in a murder prosecution.” , (internal quotations and alterations omitted) ( , ).
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
¶66 “[A]ny photograph of the deceased in any murder case is relevant to assist a jury to understand an issue because the fact and cause of death are always relevant in a murder prosecution.” (internal quotations and alterations omitted) ( ).
State v. Spreitz 39 P.3d 525 Ariz. 2002
State v. Spreitz 39 P.3d 525 Ariz. 2002
State v. Navarro 34 P.3d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Navarro 34 P.3d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
State v. Nordstrom 25 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2001
State v. Nordstrom 25 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2001
State v. Bocharski 22 P.3d 43 Ariz. 2001
State v. Bocharski 22 P.3d 43 Ariz. 2001
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
State v. O'MEARA 4 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. O'MEARA 4 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Clary 2 P.3d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Clary 2 P.3d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Vera 996 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Vera 996 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
In enforcing traffic laws, officers often “detain persons ‘under circumstances which would not justify an arrest.’ ” -43 , -74 (1997)
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
(alcohol may have caused some impairment, but not enough to meet the (G)(1) mitigator); Rienhardt, 190 Ariz. at 591-92 , 951 P.2d at 466-67 (no evidence offered that could establish the level of intoxication); , (mental health expert offered inconclusive evidence related to mental illness); -50 , -81 (1997) (long-time substance abuse problems insufficient to establish the (G)(1) mitigator); , (insufficient evidence to show methamphetamine use impaired conduct on the day of the murder)
State v. Clabourne 983 P.2d 748 Ariz. 1999
State v. Clabourne 983 P.2d 748 Ariz. 1999
1192 , 140 L.Ed.2d 321 (1998) (lethal gas); , cert.
State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. Brown 982 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1999
State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. Brown 982 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1999
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
“Cruelty is found when the ‘victim [is] conscious at the time of the offense in order to suffer pain and distress.’” , (alteration in original) ( , ).
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
State v. Marshall 975 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Marshall 975 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Vasko 971 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Vasko 971 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998