Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Krum, 903 P.2d 596.

62 citing documents.

State v. Petkovic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Petkovic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
A court may properly disregard factual assertions that are wholly contradicted by the record, see Chairez, 235 Ariz. at 102, ¶ 15, or which are conclusory and “lack any reliable factual foundation,” (affirming a court’s ruling rejecting a claim about recanted victim testimony when the claim was supported by third-party affidavits which were “conclusory and completely lacking in detail”).
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
n.5 (1995) (“The United States Supreme Court has made clear that, at least when a defendant is entitled to a direct appeal with the assistance of counsel, there is no constitutional right to counsel or effective assistance in post-conviction proceedings.”); Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991) (“There is
yauck/alt v. West Town Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
yauck/alt v. West Town Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
602 (“A witness may testify to a matter only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter.”); (“[A]ffidavits that only set forth ultimate facts or conclusions of law can neither support nor defeat a motion for summary judgment.” (citation omitted)); 294 (1995) (affirming trial court’s denial of relief to criminal defendant who sought post-conviction relief based on affidavits of third parties asserting that “the victim recanted h
State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
– 95 (1995) (a petition presenting allegations that are vague, conclusory, or wholly incredible is subject to summary dismissal).
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review the summary dismissal of a post-conviction relief proceeding for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 17 (2006) (), and will affirm “on any basis supported by the record,” (citing M. Udall & J. Livermore, Law of Evidence § 13, at 22 (2d ed. 1982)).
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–31 (App. 1995); –92 (1995).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
A defendant who did not enter a plea agreement has “no constitutional right to counsel or effective assistance in post-conviction proceedings.” n.5 (1995).
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cloud Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
2 STATE v. JOHNSON Decision of the Court Ariz. 319, 336–37 (1996); –92 (1995); –75 (App. 1993).
State v. Travis Wade Amaral 368 P.3d 925 Ariz. 2016
State v. Travis Wade Amaral 368 P.3d 925 Ariz. 2016
E.g., Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. at 579 ¶ 31, 278 P.3d at 1282; Jeffers, 135 Ariz. at 427, 661 P.2d at 1128.
State v. Caratachea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Caratachea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(recognizing a defendant has a right to effective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction of-right proceeding).
State v. Ayala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ayala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Ramon Escareno Meraz 307 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Ramon Escareno Meraz 307 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-37, -53 (1996); -92 & n.5, -600 & n.5 (1995); -75, -35 (App. 1993)
State v. Chairez 327 P.3d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Chairez 327 P.3d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-94 , -02 (1995) (no abuse of discretion by trial court in determining no colorable claim raised by third-party affidavits asserting victim recanted, which court did not find credible).