DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Fulminante, 975 P.2d 75.

175 citing documents.

  • State v. Hall 65 P.3d 90 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Bronson 63 P.3d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
  • State v. Bronson 63 P.3d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
    “[E]rroneously admitted evidence is harmless in a criminal case only when the reviewing court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not impact the verdict.” Bass, 198 Ariz. at 580-81, ¶ 39 , 12 P.3d at 805-06 ; ¶ 49
  • Henry v. Healthpartners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • Henry v. Healthpartners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
    216, the court held that a letter by plaintiff’s counsel stating that plaintiff’s son had caused the accident was “properly admitted for 5 the legitimate purpose of attacking the credibility of [plaintiff’s] testimony as to the cause of the accident.” ¶8 Contrary to Henry’s argument, P.2d 75 (1999), did not nullify the holding in Reed.
  • State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
  • State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
  • State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
  • State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
  • State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
    ¶25 In State v. Fulminante, this court held that “the statement must describe de-clarant’s present feeling or future intention rather than look backward, describing de-clarant’s past memory or belief about another’s conduct.” Id., , , 85 ¶ 32 (1999).
  • State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
    500 ¶ 49, , 90 ¶ 49 (1999).
  • State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In Re JULIO L 3 P.3d 383 Ariz. 2000
  • In Re JULIO L 3 P.3d 383 Ariz. 2000
  • State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Garza 994 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
  • State v. Garza 994 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999