Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Fulminante, 975 P.2d 75.
- State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
-
State v. Dann
74 P.3d 231
Ariz. 2003
¶ 64 , (“An objection is sufficiently made if it provides the judge with an opportunity to provide a remedy.”).
- State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Hall 65 P.3d 90 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Hall 65 P.3d 90 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Bronson 63 P.3d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
State v. Bronson
63 P.3d 1058
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
“[E]rroneously admitted evidence is harmless in a criminal case only when the reviewing court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not impact the verdict.” Bass, 198 Ariz. at 580-81, ¶ 39 , 12 P.3d at 805-06 ; ¶ 49
- Henry v. Healthpartners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
-
Henry v. Healthpartners
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
216, the court held that a letter by plaintiff’s counsel stating that plaintiff’s son had caused the accident was “properly admitted for 5 the legitimate purpose of attacking the credibility of [plaintiff’s] testimony as to the cause of the accident.” ¶8 Contrary to Henry’s argument, P.2d 75 (1999), did not nullify the holding in Reed.
- State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
- State v. Booker 53 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
- State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
-
State v. Pandeli
26 P.3d 1136
Ariz. 2001
¶25 In State v. Fulminante, this court held that “the statement must describe de-clarant’s present feeling or future intention rather than look backward, describing de-clarant’s past memory or belief about another’s conduct.” Id., , , 85 ¶ 32 (1999).
- State v. Ring 25 P.3d 1139 Ariz. 2001
-
State v. Ring
25 P.3d 1139
Ariz. 2001
500 ¶ 49, , 90 ¶ 49 (1999).
- State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
- State v. Bass 12 P.3d 796 Ariz. 2000
- State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- In Re JULIO L 3 P.3d 383 Ariz. 2000
- In Re JULIO L 3 P.3d 383 Ariz. 2000
- State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- State v. Garza 994 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- State v. Garza 994 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999