Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. LeBlanc, 924 P.2d 441.

132 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Diliz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
pies the position of resolving factual disputes, and where conflicting inferences may be drawn from the evidence, we must resolve the issues in a manner 13 STATE v. DILIZ Opinion of the Court most likely to uphold the trial court’s findings.”)
State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel Ariz. 2026
¶16 In Lua, when provocation manslaughter is at issue.
State v. Albin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Albin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State of Arizona v. Lazaro Enrique Villa, Jr. 548 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Lazaro Enrique Villa, Jr. 548 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Larry James Fournier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Larry James Fournier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
A. Lesser-included instruction for provocation manslaughter ¶28 The trial court instructed the jury on manslaughter as a directing the jury that it may consider the lesser offense if it either “find[s] the defendant not guilty” or “cannot agree on whether to find the defendant guilty or not guilty” of the greater offenses.
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Preston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Preston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“[T]he jury may deliberate on a lesser offense if it either (1) finds the defendant not guilty on the greater 7 STATE v. PRESTON Decision of the Court charge, or (2) after reasonable efforts cannot agree whethe
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(explaining that “[j]urors are presumed to follow instructions.”) (citation omitted).
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Warren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Warren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State of Arizona v. Philip John Martin 446 P.3d 806 Ariz. 2019
State of Arizona v. Philip John Martin 446 P.3d 806 Ariz. 2019
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
See State v. LeBlanc , , 439-40
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hiles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hiles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Day v. Armendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Day v. Armendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wetherilt v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wetherilt v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Love Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Love Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Haskie 378 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Haskie 378 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“Jurors are presumed to follow instructions.”) ().
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(jury may deliberate on a lesser-included offense if it either finds defendant not guilty on the greater charge or, after reasonable efforts, cannot agree whether to acquit or convict on the greater charge), the court instructed the jury as follows: The crime of second-deg
State v. Dalton 366 P.3d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sumpter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sumpter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Justice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Justice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Jurors are presumed to follow instructions.”).
State of Arizona v. Christepher E. Lua 350 P.3d 805 Ariz. 2015