Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Doerr, 969 P.2d 1168.

176 citing documents.

State v. Grell 135 P.3d 696 Ariz. 2006
State v. Grell 135 P.3d 696 Ariz. 2006
“The trial judge has broad discretion in determining the weight and credibility given to mental health evidence.” ¶ 64
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
To establish relishing, we usually “require that the defendant say or do something, other than the commission of the crime itself, to show he savored the murder.” Id.; accord *32 -68, ¶ 54 , -80 (1998) (finding that defendant relished murder after defendant bragged to his cellmate about playing with the victim’s blood); , (finding that defendant relished murder and demonstrated an “abhorrent lack of regard for
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
(finding robbery instruction that defendant “threatened or used force with the intent either to coerce the surrender of the property or to prevent resistance to his taking or retaining the property” adequately informed the jurors of the co-existence requirement and provided an adequate basis for felony murder conviction); ¶ 35 , (holding “[w]here the law is adequately covered by instructions as a whole, no reversible error has occurred.”).
State v. Jones 49 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2002
State v. Jones 49 P.3d 273 Ariz. 2002
¶ 41, ¶ 41 (1998); Chapple, 135 Ariz. at 289-90, 660 P.2d at 1216-17.
State v. Carlson 48 P.3d 1180 Ariz. 2002
State v. Carlson 48 P.3d 1180 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
-62 , , 1173-74 ¶ 18 (1998).
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Green 29 P.3d 271 Ariz. 2001
State v. Green 29 P.3d 271 Ariz. 2001
HARMLESS ERROR ¶ 21 “[T]his court will not reverse a conviction if an error is clearly harmless.” , ¶33 (1998).
State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
State v. Pandeli 26 P.3d 1136 Ariz. 2001
b. Mutilation ¶ 40 Mutilation, also a form of heinousness and depravity, “is an act distinct *376 from the killing itself that includes the purposeful severing of body parts.” , , 1180 ¶ 55 (1998).
State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
State v. Hoskins 14 P.3d 997 Ariz. 2000
See Martinez, 196 Ariz. at 464 , 999 P.2d at 808 ¶ 53 (deferring to the trial court’s evaluation of medical experts’ credibility); , , 1181 ¶ 64 (1998) (“[T]he trial judge has broad discretion in determining the weight and credibility given to mental health evidence.”).
State v. Martinez 999 P.2d 795 Ariz. 2000
State v. Martinez 999 P.2d 795 Ariz. 2000
(stating that “[t]he trial judge has broad discretion in determining the weight and credibility given to mental health evidence”).
State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Cordova 8 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
“We will reverse only if the instructions, taken together, would have misled the jurors.” , cert.
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
State v. Kayer 984 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1999
Ramirez, 178 Ariz. at 131 , 871 P.2d at 252 .