Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jones, 4 P.3d 345.
- State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Moody
94 P.3d 1119
Ariz. 2004
E.g., State v. Montaño, ¶ 36 , (-42, ¶ 50 , -12 (2000)); ¶ 24 , ¶ 22
- State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Davolt
84 P.3d 456
Ariz. 2004
( ¶ 44, -64, -67 (1993); ); see also Blakley, 204 Ariz. at ___, ¶ 15, 65 P.3d at 82.
- State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Dann 74 P.3d 231 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
- State v. Carlson 48 P.3d 1180 Ariz. 2002
-
State v. Carlson
48 P.3d 1180
Ariz. 2002
See, , 307 ¶ 44, , 362 ¶ 44 (2000) (citing Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 554 , 96 S.Ct.
- State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
- State v. Blackman 38 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
State v. Blackman
38 P.3d 1192
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on such a motion unless we find a clear abuse of discretion, , and as we review such rulings we bear in mind that “the trial court is in the best position to determine whether an attorney’s remarks require a mistrial.” ¶ 37 , (-97 , -57 (1988)).
- State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
- State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
- State v. Nordstrom 25 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2001
-
State v. Nordstrom
25 P.3d 717
Ariz. 2001
307 ¶ 44, , 362 ¶ 44 (2000) ( , , ).
- Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. 31 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc.
31 P.3d 806
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
That won’t be redacted from the report.” ¶ 34 “Evidentiary rulings are subject to the trial court’s determination and will not be disturbed, absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 47 , cert.
- State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000
- State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000