Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Mitchell v. Mitchell, 732 P.2d 208.
- Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re the Marriage of Duvall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- In Re the Marriage of Duvall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
such intangible rights as the goodwill of a business or the names of customers.”); (holding in a dissolution case that valuing goodwill is difficult, but courts have discretion to determine the value of goodwill based on the unique facts of each case).
- Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jost v. Jost Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Jost v. Jost
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(upholding business valuation that was supported by expert testimony despite the existence of an alternate method proposed by a different expert).
- Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Driss v. Driss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Driss v. Driss
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(upholding business valuation that was supported by expert testimony that a gross fees approach was preferable to excess earnings method proposed by a different expert); Kelsey, 186 Ariz. at 51.
- Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lynum v. Tavares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Lynum v. Tavares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- McClendon v. McClendon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- McClendon v. McClendon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Moran v. Moran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Moran v. Moran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Thomas v. Njie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Thomas v. Njie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard
334 P.3d 734
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(affirming in a family law context that trial courts must determine a business entity’s value based on each case’s facts and circumstances); (asserting that “[t]he valuation of [business] assets is a factual determinatio