Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mitchell v. Mitchell, 732 P.2d 208.

73 citing documents.

Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(affirming in a family law context that trial courts must determine a business entity’s value based on each case’s facts and circumstances); (asserting that “[t]he valuation of [business] assets is a factual determinatio
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Davies v. Davies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Teamer v. Daniells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Teamer v. Daniells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶21 On appeal, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the decision.”
Walsh v. Walsh 286 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Walsh v. Walsh 286 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the decision, , (“Mitchell II”), and “will not disturb [the] trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous,”
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Wright 43 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Wright 43 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
§ 25-211 (2000); , cf. Schlaefer, 196 Ariz. at 339, ¶ 10 , 996 P.2d at 748 (holding that presumption that debts incurred during marriage are community obligations may only be overcome by clear and convincing evidence).
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Marriage of Gerow v. Covill 960 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Marriage of Gerow v. Covill 960 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
our supreme court addressed two marital dissolution issues: (1) Whether the wife had a community interest in the goodwill of her husband’s professional practice and (2) if so, whether she was bound by the partnership agreement which established a zero value for the goodwill.
In Re Marriage of Molloy 888 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
In Re Marriage of Molloy 888 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
The valuation in each case must be determined on its “own facts and circumstances.” , ( , (discussing valuation of goodwill)).
Marriage of Molloy v. Molloy 761 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Marriage of Molloy v. Molloy 761 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
our supreme court considered the evaluation of community property rights in the goodwill value of an accounting firm.