Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly, 800 P.2d 962.

97 citing documents.

GARCIDUENAS v. MATRIX NEW WORLD Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Perez v. Patterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Patterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Fort Lowell—NSS Ltd. P’ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (1965).
Rosales v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rosales v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ a landowner “is not ordinarily found negligent for injuries to those invitees from conditions which are open and obvious, nor for those which are known to the invitee.”
Pacheco v. Coffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Pacheco v. Coffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lebeau v. Talbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lebeau v. Talbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Thompson v. Pham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Thompson v. Pham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(citing Restatement (Second) of Torts ("Restatement") §§ 410-415 (1965)).
Emmons v. Teleflex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emmons v. Teleflex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lowell–NSS Ltd. P’ (“Absent Arizona law to the contrary, this court will usually apply the law of the Restatement.”).
Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc. 418 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc. 418 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P'ship v. Kelly , , 98, 104, , 964, 970 (1990) (landowner liable to employee of a third-party business operator for negligence of independent contractor).
Gonzalez v. Mat Const Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gonzalez v. Mat Const Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ Welker, 1 Ariz. App. at 404-05.
Santorii v. MartinezRusso, LLC 381 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Santorii v. MartinezRusso, LLC 381 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ (“Absent Arizona law to the contrary, this court will usually apply the law of the Restatement.”).
Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation 365 P.3d 944 Ariz. 2016
Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation 365 P.3d 944 Ariz. 2016
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ (“Absent Arizona law to the contrary, this court will usually apply the law of the Restatement.”); Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 770 (Ky.
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ 3 Most, if not all, of the exceptions fall into three broad categories: 2 In many reported decisions, as well as the Restatement, the terms employer, possessor of land, and landowner are used interchangeably in discussing the liability of an entity that hires a general contractor
Emerman v. Az Holding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Emerman v. Az Holding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ (holding that the general rule is that an employer is not vicariously liable for an independent contractor’s negligence unless the employer has been independently negligent).
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
First Credit Union v. Courtney 309 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
First Credit Union v. Courtney 309 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ (court follows Restatement absent contrary Arizona law); Restatement (Third) of 3 Although Arizona law distinguishes between surety and guaranty contracts, see, e.g., McClellan Mortg.
Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Co. 275 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Co. 275 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ (noting that common carriers “are often held to possess an affirmative duty to guard the safety of their [passengers]”); Second Restatement § 314A cmt.
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ , , ).
Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan 234 P.3d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
ELLSWORTH LAND AND LIVESTOCK INC. v. Bush 233 P.3d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
ELLSWORTH LAND AND LIVESTOCK INC. v. Bush 233 P.3d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan 234 P.3d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Patterson 218 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pride of San Juan, Inc. v. Pratt 212 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pride of San Juan, Inc. v. Pratt 212 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ , E.L.
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007