Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly, 800 P.2d 962.

97 citing documents.

Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’-04, - 70 (1990) (no liability for landowner not in control of premises; “it is the fact of possession that triggers the landowner’s duty to his invitees”).
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Rand v. Porsche Financial Services 167 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ , 101— 05, -71 (1990) (holding that Restatement (Second) of Torts § 422(b) imposes liability on a possessor of land for injuries that occur to an invitee while he is in possession and result from his independent contractor’s negligence).
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller 141 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ P.2d 962 (1990).
Myers v. City of Tempe 128 P.3d 751 Ariz. 2006
Myers v. City of Tempe 128 P.3d 751 Ariz. 2006
Lowell v. Kelly, describing non-delegable duties as those “imposed by statute, by contract, by franchise or charter, or by the common law.” (holding a landowner liable for actions of an independent contractor).
Wertheim v. Pima Co. Dupnik Pima Co. Sheriff Tucson Police Dept. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Wertheim v. Pima Co. Dupnik Pima Co. Sheriff Tucson Police Dept. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ P.2d 962 (1990).
Nelson v. Grayhawk Properties L.L.C. 104 P.3d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Nelson v. Grayhawk Properties L.L.C. 104 P.3d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Lowell-NSS Ltd. P’ , (finding possessor of land vicariously liable for invitees’ injuries even though they were caused by an independent contractor)).
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 10 P.3d 625 Ariz. 2000
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 10 P.3d 625 Ariz. 2000
Ramirez v. Health Partners 972 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Followed Ramirez v. Health Partners 972 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
(“One of the reasons, if not the main reason that we follow the Restatement in the absence of prior Arizona decisions, is that the Restatement is supposed to represent the general law on the subject in the United States.”).
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Lowell-NSS Limited Partnership v. Kelly, *85 , (where it was arguable that only Restatement (Second) of Torts § 422(a) (1965) had been adopted in Arizona, court had to decide whether to adopt section 422(b)).
Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 957 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 957 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-100 , -66 (1990), and adding to its delay and expense.
Munroe v. Galati 938 P.2d 1114 Ariz. 1997
Munroe v. Galati 938 P.2d 1114 Ariz. 1997
City of Phoenix v. Yarnell 909 P.2d 377 Ariz. 1995
City of Phoenix v. Yarnell 909 P.2d 377 Ariz. 1995
Horizon Resources Bethany Ltd. v. Cutco Industries, Inc. 881 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Horizon Resources Bethany Ltd. v. Cutco Industries, Inc. 881 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Jds v. Superior Crt., Cnty. of Maricopa 893 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Indian Village Shopping Center Investment Co. v. Kroger Co. 854 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Indian Village Shopping Center Investment Co. v. Kroger Co. 854 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Lavit v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lavit v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990