Cited by

Where cross-motions for summary judgment are filed, “summary judgment in favor of either party is appropriate only ‘if the facts produced in support of the [other party's] claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.’” ¶ 13 (2003) (alteration in original) (quoting Orme Sch.

We review the superior court’s ruling de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

¶ 12 (2003) (stating that “[b]ecause interpretation of .

¶10 We will therefore review the validity of the judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

DISCUSSION ¶16 “We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

¶14 This court reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶14 This court reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶ 12 (2003); Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Tr.

¶ 12 (2003); Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund, ¶ 13 (2002).

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters.

“We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

¶9 We review the superior court’s ruling on motions for summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence “in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

sections 12-120.21(A)(1) and -2101(A)(1) (2022).2 DISCUSSION ¶10 This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters.

DISCUSSION ¶8 This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).