Cited by

¶ 12 (2003) (citation omitted).

¶26 We review an entry of summary judgment de novo, ¶ 12 (2003), and we review questions of law de novo, United Servs.

The court “view[s] the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

“We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

A motion for summary judgment should be granted “if the facts produced in support of the [opposing party’s claims] have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.” ¶ 13 (2003) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

“We review de novo a grant of 4 KOSKOVICH v. SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE HOSPITALS, et al. Decision of the Court summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

“We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).

“We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 12 (2003).