Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1357 citing documents.

Rebecca W. v. Derek B., R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rebecca W. v. Derek B., R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 24 (2005); see also Brenda D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 39 (2018) (explaining due process violation does not warrant reversal without a showing of prejudice).
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“At this stage, the child’s interest in obtaining a loving, stable home, or at the very least avoiding a potentially harmful relationship with a parent, deserves at least as much weight as that accorded the interest of the unfit parent in maintaining parental rights.” ¶ 37 (2005).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tiffany L. v. Dcs, I.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
However, as Mother recognizes in her brief, clear and convincing evidence does not require “conclusive” evidence, but instead evidence that is “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (internal quotation omitted).
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
Tiffany L. v. Dcs, I.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alexandra C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alexandra C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); -82, 288, ¶¶ 7, 41 (2005).
Chelsie H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Chelsie H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Angelica B. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Angelica B. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
we can presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 35 (2005).
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by