Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1369 citing documents.

Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
The court must also find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Kristina J. v. Dcs, K.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Kristina J. v. Dcs, K.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶12 Although not absolute, parents have “a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” ¶ 24 (2005).
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rebecca W. v. Derek B., R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rebecca W. v. Derek B., R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 24 (2005); see also Brenda D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 39 (2018) (explaining due process violation does not warrant reversal without a showing of prejudice).
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“At this stage, the child’s interest in obtaining a loving, stable home, or at the very least avoiding a potentially harmful relationship with a parent, deserves at least as much weight as that accorded the interest of the unfit parent in maintaining parental rights.” ¶ 37 (2005).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tiffany L. v. Dcs, I.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
However, as Mother recognizes in her brief, clear and convincing evidence does not require “conclusive” evidence, but instead evidence that is “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (internal quotation omitted).
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
Tiffany L. v. Dcs, I.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alexandra C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alexandra C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); -82, 288, ¶¶ 7, 41 (2005).
Chelsie H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Chelsie H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by