Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.
- Angelica B. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Angelica B. v. Dcs, J.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
- Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Clint G. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
we can presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 35 (2005).
- Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
- Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Sam H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Sam H. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
-
Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Anthony A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Anthony A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jennifer B., Jonathan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Jennifer B., Jonathan B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
- Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
at 4, ¶ 15 ( ¶ 35 (2016)).
- Lindy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Lindy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Francine C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
.”); ¶ 24 (2005) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982)).
- Fernando G. v. Dcs, L.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Fernando G. v. Dcs, L.G.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶10 “Parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” ¶ 24 (2005).
- Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Emily B., Andrew D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Emily B., Andrew D. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982)); see also Michael J. 196 at Ariz. 246, 248 (2000).
- Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Morgan B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); -82, 288, ¶¶ 7, 41 (2005).
-
Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
ear and convincing evidence (1) the parent has a history of chronic abuse of controlled substances; (2) the parent is unable to discharge her parental responsibilities because of her chronic abuse of controlled substances; and (3) reasonable grounds exist to believe the condition will continue “for a prolonged and indeterminate period.” Raymond F., 224 Ariz. at 377, ¶ 15; ¶ 22 (2005).
- Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Morgan F. v. Dcs, D.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Morgan F. v. Dcs, D.F.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 41 (2005).
- Michaela F., Brian F. v. Benjamin A., T.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Michaela F., Brian F. v. Benjamin A., T.A.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 42 (2005).
- Richard M. v. Patrick M. 462 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020