Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1357 citing documents.

Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrin v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 8–533(B)(8)(c); ¶ 41 (2005).
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ray M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ray M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 24 (2005) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982)).
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- 82, ¶ 7 (2005) (citing A.R.S.
A.L. v. J.B. G.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A.L. v. J.B. G.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶15 At the best-interests stage, we “presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.” Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 150, ¶ 12 ( ¶ 35 (2005)).
State v. Brissette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Brissette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“The preponderance of the evidence standard requires that the fact-finder determine whether a fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.” ¶ 25 (2005).
Lionel M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lionel M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 24 (2005).
Raquel C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Raquel C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 22 (2005).
Sydnee J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sydnee J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-533(B); ¶¶ 41-42 (2005).
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (internal quotation omitted).
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS-8441, (holding that a parent who participated in some services but maintained instability in his residence and employment substantially neglected to remedy the circumstances causing the child to be in an out-of-home placement), ¶ 41 (2005).
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
–86, ¶¶ 28, 30–32 (2005).
Justin M., Stephanie R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Justin M., Stephanie R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-537(B), and by a preponderance of evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests, ¶ 41 (2005).
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Timothy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Timothy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-533(B); ¶¶ 41-42 (2005).
Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shanna A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ryan D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ryan D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-537(B), and find by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests, ¶ 41 (2005).
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shanna A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); -82, 288, ¶¶ 7, 41 (2005).
Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018