Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1357 citing documents.

Mary Jean M. v. Dcs, E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
we can presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge because the court has already found the existence of one of the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 35 (2005); see also In re Maricopa Cty.
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Daphne N. v. Michael B., A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeremy E. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeremy E. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and that termination is in the children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 41 (2005).
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
Daphne N. v. Michael B., A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vincent G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vincent G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-537(B), and find by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in a child’s best interests, ¶ 41 (2005).
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and proof by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41 (2005).
Francisco v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Francisco v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Demetric L. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Demetric L. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and that termination is in the child's best interests by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 41 (2005).
Tara M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tara M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
To begin, the court found clear and convincing evidence of at least one statutory ground for termination, which indicates “the interests of the parent and child diverge.” ¶ 35 (2005).
Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Breyana M. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Breyana M. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer P. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer P. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and that termination is in the children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 41 (2005).
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 24 (2005) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 754 (1982)).
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-82, 284, ¶¶ 7, 22 (2005) (requiring clear and convincing evidence of at least one statutory ground under A.R.S.
Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
at 249, ¶ 12; ¶ 41 (2005).
Zachary W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Zachary W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
5 Mother was previously diagnosed with depression and testified she received medication for “sleep” and to “[re]gain her appetite.” 4 GABRIELLA L. v. DCS et al. Decision of the Court evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests, ¶ 41 (2005).
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Caterina W. v. Anthony R., S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Caterina W. v. Anthony R., S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
5 LOGAN B. v. DCS, et al. Opinion of the Court ¶ 41 (2005).
Chase M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sean M., Mary K. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Albert D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018