Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1369 citing documents.

Corey C. v. Dcs, B.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8-533(B), Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 249, ¶ 12, and upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§§ 8-533(B), -537(B); -82, ¶ 7 (2005).
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Phyllicia C. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review ¶17 “Parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” ¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 5 TABATHA T. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 Father takes issue with the juvenile court’s reliance on Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, ( ¶ 12 (2005)), for the court’s conclusion that Father’s inconsistent participation in services for a special needs child can constitute the circumstances causing the out-of-home placement.
Phyllicia C. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Thomas M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Thomas M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Chastity S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Chastity S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Clear and convincing means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25, -19 (2005).
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review ¶17 “Parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” ¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Heather R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Roger W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heather R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–82, 288, ¶¶ 7, 41 (2005) (interpreting A.R.S.
Roger W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 22, (best interests findings must be supported by preponderance of evidence).
Tiffany S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tiffany S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Jessica C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jessica C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8–533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Jimmy B. v. Dcs, R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jesse O., Daniel W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jimmy B. v. Dcs, R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jesse O., Daniel W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nicole R. v. Dean C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nicole R. v. Dean C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Colene P. v. Dcs, D.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Colene P. v. Dcs, D.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶12 Once a juvenile court finds that a parent is unfit, the focus shifts to the child’s best interests and the court must balance the unfit parent’s diluted interest “against the independent and often adverse interests of the child in a safe and stable home life.” ¶ 15, ( ¶ 35, ).
Michael Y. v. Dcs, C.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michael Y. v. Dcs, C.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Arthur B. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Arthur B. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Decision of the Court Bobby M., ¶ 22 (2005).
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016