Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1357 citing documents.

E.O. v. Michael M., Katie A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mohammad K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mohammad K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 8–533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Danielle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danielle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 41 (App. 2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Sandra T. v. Trevor A., H.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sandra T. v. Trevor A., H.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dixie J. v. John S., A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dixie J. v. John S., A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Decision of the Court Bobby M., ¶ 22 (2005).
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jodie F. v. Kyle Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jodie F. v. Kyle Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Carrie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carrie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ct. 66(C); ¶ 41 (2005), but Father does not argue insufficient evidence supports this finding.
Jesus S. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michael R. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Andrew G. v. Dcs, S.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michael R. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jesus S. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Andrew G. v. Dcs, S.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 8-533(B); ¶ 22 (2005).
Erbey B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jennifer S. v. Dcs, Z.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Erbey B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ct. 66(C); ¶ 41 (2005), but Father does not argue insufficient evidence supports this finding.
Jennifer S. v. Dcs, Z.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Alvin S. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Alvin S. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Adrian E. v. Department of Child Safety 369 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Adrian E. v. Department of Child Safety 369 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
“When a statute is clear and unambiguous, we apply its plain language and need not engage in any other means of statutory interpretation.”
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ct. 66(C); ¶ 41 (2005).6 Mother does not dispute Child would benefit from severance, but argues the court erred in terminating her parental rights when a permanent guardianship was “a less drastic and equally beneficial alternative.” ¶12 Mother does not cite any authority to support her contention that, after f
Jessica N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jessica N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Victor H. v. Dcs, N.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Victor H. v. Dcs, N.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Under Rule 64(C), a parent facing termination of his parental rights must receive a “notice of hearing” advising him that “failure to appear at the initial hearing, pretrial conference, status conference or termination adjudication hearing, without good cause, may result in a ¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jeffrey P. v. Department of Child Safety 368 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Bobby M., ¶ 41 (2005), but Mother does not argue insufficient evidence supports this finding.
Jeffrey P. v. Department of Child Safety 368 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Eugene W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Eugene W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 24, (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016