Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kent K. v. Bobby M., 110 P.3d 1013.

1357 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Woyton v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Woyton v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 21 (2005) (“Had the legislature desired to apply the clear and convincing evidence standard to the finding of best interests of the child, it easily could have done so.”).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” –85, ¶ 25 (2005) (citation omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
at 249, ¶ 12 (clear and convincing evidence); -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (preponderance of the evidence); see A.R.S.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Y.G. and Y.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Y.G. and Y.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
A court may terminate parental rights “under certain circumstances, so long as the parents whose rights are to be severed are provided with ‘fundamentally fair procedures’ that satisfy due process.” ¶ 24 (2005) (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 754 (1982)).
Bisono E. v. Dcs, I.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Bisono E. v. Dcs, I.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. and J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. and J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Evidence is “clear and convincing” if it is “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (citation omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶¶ 41–42 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶14 Once the superior court has found the existence of a statutory ground for termination by clear and convincing evidence, the court can “presume that the interests of the parent and child diverge,” ¶ 35 (2005), and its “focus shifts to the interests of the child as distinct from those of the parent.” Id.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E v. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Roland T. v. Jessica D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E v. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 42 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Roland T. v. Jessica D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” –85, ¶ 25 (2005).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Kaelyn W. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Kaelyn W. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” –85, ¶ 25 (2005).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO J.L., et al. Decision of the Court and convincing means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005) (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 577 (1982)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Casey G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Casey G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and if termination is in the children’s best interests as proven by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 41 (2005).
Stella H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Stella H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samuel P. v. Mindy D., A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samuel P. v. Mindy D., A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
at 249, ¶ 12; ¶ 22 (2005).
Marcos G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Marcos G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jackson G., Elizabeth S. v. Dcs, J.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
at 249, ¶ 12 (clear and convincing evidence); ¶ 41 (2005) (preponderance of the evidence); see A.R.S.
Jackson G., Elizabeth S. v. Dcs, J.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Margaret P. v. Dcs, V.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Margaret P. v. Dcs, V.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 41 (2005); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Kyle R., Dawna-Jo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kyle R., Dawna-Jo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Clear and convincing” means the grounds for termination are “highly probable or reasonably certain.” -85, ¶ 25 (2005).
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022