Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite New PCR Intl. v. ICA, 107 P.3d 923.

89 citing documents.

State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Sec., –83 ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (citation omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Majidi v. Milkwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., –83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Overfield v. Sungulyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., –83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005); Ariz. R. Prot.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (citation omitted).
Samuel Paz v. City of Tucson 539 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (citation omitted).
Jaen v. Hoag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (citation omitted).
Shelly W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nathan L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2005) (noting that "conflicts in the evidence are for the fact-finder to resolve").
Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., –83 ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Candace G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Demetrice H. v. Dcs, D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aaron F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael D. v. Dcs, R.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., –82, ¶¶ 13, 16 (App. 2005).
Navigators v. First Mercury Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -82, ¶ 13 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Georgia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We review the juvenile court’s denial of a motion to set aside for an abuse of discretion, Trisha A., 247 Ariz. at 91, ¶ 27, and reverse only if “the juvenile court’s exercise of that discretion was ‘manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,’” ¶ 15 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -82, ¶ 13 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Jimmy F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Vincent S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -82, ¶¶ 13, 16 (App. 2005).
Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We review the juvenile court’s finding that a parent failed to appear without good cause for an abuse of discretion and will reverse only if “the juvenile court’s exercise of that discretion was ‘manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.’” ¶ 15 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶8 This court will affirm the juvenile court’s evidentiary rulings “absent a clear abuse of its discretion and resulting prejudice.” –83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -82, ¶¶ 13, 16 (App. 2005) (citing Jesus M., 203 Ariz. at 280, ¶ 4).
Manuel T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -82, ¶¶ 13, 16 (App. 2005) (citations omitted); Jesus M., 203 Ariz. at 280, ¶ 4 (citing Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Justin M., Stephanie R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., - 83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (“A trial court has broad discretion in admitting or excluding evidence, and we will not disturb its decision absent a clear abuse of its discretion and resulting prejudice.”).
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Breyana M. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Patrick G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2005)), because the juvenile court is in the “best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings,” Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
James A. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
82-83, ¶ 19, , 928-29 (App. 2005).
Melissa M. v. Dcs, J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005).
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (internal quotation and citation omitted)).
Anthony W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2005), and the case manager’s testimony is sufficient to uphold the juvenile court’s finding.
Stella H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2005) (reweighing evidence is not the function of this court).
Jessica M. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2005) (reweighing evidence is not the function of this court).
Tovah K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., –82, ¶ 13 (App. 2005).
Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., 5 NICOLE M. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005) (citation omitted); see also Alice M. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2015) (applying harmless error analysis to the juvenile court’s error) (citation omitted).
Andres M., Robert M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., –82, ¶ 13 (App. 2005); In re Maricopa Cty.
Traci E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kayoma S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2005), and Jennifer B. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.