Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite New PCR Intl. v. ICA, 107 P.3d 923.
-
Jessica C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 19, (internal quotation and citation omitted)).
-
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety
381 P.3d 264
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
-
Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005)) (internal quotations omitted).
-
Forrest C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -82, ¶¶ 12-13 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
-
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
-
Kelly M. v. Karen K., Peter K., B.L.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
-
Stacey M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -82, ¶ 13, -28 (App. 2005) (“we look only to determine whether there was substantial evidence to sustain” the juvenile court’s findings, and “we 2In its answering brief, DCS admitted the juvenile court should have allowed Stacey to testify about the children’s best interests, but a
- Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
James M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -82, ¶ 13 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
- Jesus S. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Victor H. v. Dcs, N.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19, (citation omitted).
-
State v. Krznarich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
- Justin C. v. Dcs, S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Kimberlee K. v. Dcs, I.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Teresa F. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
-
Enrico G. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -82, ¶ 13, -28 (App. 2005).
-
Catherine B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 19, (citation omitted).
-
Bethany C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –83 ¶ 19, –29 (App. 2005).
- Angela B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Sherri C. v. Dcs, H.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 (App. 2005) ().
-
Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –83, ¶ 19, –30 (App. 2005).
- Brian H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Eddie B. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Krieger v. Duick
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -83, ¶ 19, -29 (App. 2005).
- Diana R. v. Dcs, I.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Desiree S. v. Department of Child Safety
334 P.3d 222
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 13, ( ¶ 12, (stating that substantial evidence is any relevant evidence that allows a reasonable person to reach the same conclusion as the fact-finder)).
- Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Amanda S. v. Ades, R.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -83, ¶ 19, -29 (App. 2005).
-
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley
313 P.3d 537
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Sec., , , 926 (App.2005).
- Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 312 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
258 P.3d 233
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Sec., ¶ 13 , , 927 (App.2005).
- Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
219 P.3d 296
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Sec., , , 927 (App.2005).
-
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
178 P.3d 511
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Sec., -83, ¶ 19 , , 928-29 (App.2005) (citations omitted).
-
Lawrence R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
177 P.3d 327
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
The test to determine whether the instructions are accurate is “whether the instructions, viewed in their entirety, adequately set forth the law applicable to the case.” ¶ 8 , , 927 (App.2005) (citation omitted).
- Steven H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 173 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
159 P.3d 562
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sec., , 82, ¶ 16, , 928 (App. 2005) (“conflicts in the evidence are for the fact-finder to resolve”); Jesus M., 203 Ariz. at 282, ¶ 12 , 53 P.3d at 207 (“The resolution of such conflicts in the evidence is uniquely the province of the juvenile court as the trier of fact; we do not re-weigh the evidence on revie
- Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 158 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007