Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kelley v. Joseph Abdo/Cobre Hospital, 120 P.3d 210.

16 citing documents.

In Re MH2025-005060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See In re MH 2004-001987, ¶ 14 (App. 2005) (holding that § 36-539(B) does not require a witness’s in-person appearance).
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
611(a); see In re MH2004-001987, –59, ¶ 15 (App. 2005) (determining Arizona Rule of Evidence 611(a) “could be construed” to allow telephonic testimony in a civil mental health proceeding).
Lund v. Myers 286 P.3d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See In re MH 2004-001987, ¶ 15 , (noting that “[w]e interpret court rules according to the principles of statutory construction,” starting “with the plain language of the rules”).
In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See In re MH 2004-001987, ¶ 24
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 258 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
1849, 1853 , 173 L.Ed.2d 785 (2009); In re MH 2001-001987, ¶ 14 , (declining to imply provision not found in statute’s language).
In Re Mh-2008-000867 236 P.3d 405 Ariz. 2010
the reliability of the testimony was otherwise assured.’” In re MH- 2008-000867, 222 Ariz. at 291 ¶ 18, 213 P.3d at 1018 (quoting In re MH-2004-001987, ¶ 21, ).
In re MH 2008-001752 218 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2004-001987, ¶ 14 , ( , ).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 213 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
258, ¶ 14, , 213 (App. 2005) ( , ).
In Re Mh-2008-000867 213 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Due process is a requirement at involuntary commitment hearings “because civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of liberty.” In re MH 2004-001987, -60, ¶ 20 , -15 (App.2005) (quoting Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , ).
In re MH 2007-001895 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2004-001987, -61, 1124 , -16 (App.2005).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-61, ¶ 24 , -16 (App.2005).
In re MH 2006-000490 154 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See also In Re MH 2004-001987, ¶ 14
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 154 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
2493 , 61 L.Ed.2d 101 (1979) (Brennan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also In re MH 2004-001987, -60, ¶ 20 , -15 (App.2005); cf. O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 580 , 95 S.Ct.
Edward P. Bolding v. State of Arizona 148 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In re MH XXXX-XXXXXX No. 1 CA-MH 05-0007.