Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gipson v. Kasey, 150 P.3d 228.

292 citing documents.

Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶12 “[W]hether a duty exists, is a matter of law for the court to decide.” ¶ 9 (2007).
Wilson v. Huber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wilson v. Huber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Acri v. State 394 P.3d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Acri v. State 394 P.3d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cutter v. Crowninshield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cutter v. Crowninshield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-50, ¶ 6 (App. 2015) (identifying manners by which a duty of care may arise) ( ¶¶ 18, 23 (2007)).
Perez v. Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Perez v. Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See, ¶ 9 (2007); ¶ 6 (App. 2015); ¶ 5 (App. 2015) (citing cases).
Francis v. Purk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Francis v. Purk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ball v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ball v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 9, (citations omitted).
Johnson v. Almida Land & Cattle Co. 383 P.3d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Johnson v. Almida Land & Cattle Co. 383 P.3d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Moore v. Parham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Moore v. Parham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. 382 P.3d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. 382 P.3d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See, ¶ 9 (2007) (To establish negligence, “a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) a duty requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of care; (2) a breach by the defendant of that standard; (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual damages.”).2 He
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
Hogue v. City of Phoenix 378 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hogue v. City of Phoenix 378 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeanette M. Sanders v. Francis Alger 375 P.3d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Jeanette M. Sanders v. Francis Alger 375 P.3d 1199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
is a matter of law for the court to decide.”
Ward v. Aaa Photo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ward v. Aaa Photo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.1, ¶ 9 (2007) (“summary judgment may be appropriate if no reasonable juror could conclude that the standard of care was breached”).
Delicious v. Bbva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Delicious v. Bbva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶9 To establish a negligence claim, a plaintiff must show: “(1) a duty requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of care; (2) a breach by the defendant of that standard; (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual damages.” ¶ 9 (2007).
Alcombrack v. Ciccarelli 363 P.3d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Alcombrack v. Ciccarelli 363 P.3d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
143 ¶ 9, Grafitti-Valenzuela ex rel.
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ritchie v. Costello 356 P.3d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ritchie v. Costello 356 P.3d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶8 “To establish a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) a duty requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of care; (2) a breach by the defendant of that standard; (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual damages.” ¶ 9, (citation omitted).
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 354 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 354 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
DISCUSSION ¶ 6 “Whether the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty of care is a threshold issue; absent some duty, an action for negligence cannot be maintained.” ¶ 11
Wilks Et Vir v. Manobianco 352 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2015
Wilks Et Vir v. Manobianco 352 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2015
Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“To establish a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) a duty requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of care; (2) a breach by the defendant of that standard; (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual damages.” ¶ 9, 5 In this context, duty is a general obligation, recognized by law, requiring a defendant to conform to a particular standard of care to protect others from an unreasonable risk.
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
“[A]bsent some duty, an action for negligence cannot be maintained.” , 143 ¶ 11
Armc 2011 v. Fennemore Craig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by