Cited by

Co., ¶¶ 6–7 (2008) (holding that complaint must set forth well- pled facts to give opponent fair notice of the nature and basis of the claim, and that mere conclusory statements are insufficient).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (“Arizona follows a notice pleading standard, the purpose of which is to ‘give the opponent fair notice of the nature and basis of the claim and indicate generally the type of litigation involved.’” ()).

Co., ¶ 7 (2008), including documents that “are central to the complaint,” Strategic Dev.

Co., ¶ 7 (2008), and are not permitted “to speculate about hypothetical facts that might entitle the plaintiff to relief,” id.

Co. , , ¶ 6, (quoting Mackey v. Spangler , , 115, ).

Co., ¶ 7 (2008) (in reviewing the complaint’s dismissal, we “assume the truth of the well-pled factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences therefrom”).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) ( The complaint also named former United States Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and Wells Fargo Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf, as defendants, but neither of them are parties to this appeal.

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citation omitted) (“Arizona follows a notice pleading standard, the purpose of which is to give the opponent fair notice 5 DEUTSCHE BANK v. PHEASANT GROVE Opinion of the Court ¶15 A motion for summary judgment

Co. , , 419, ¶ 7, , 346 (2008), and will affirm "only if the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any set of facts pleaded in the complaint that are susceptible of proof," Albers v. Edelson Tech.