Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bt Capital v. Td Service Co. of Arizona, 275 P.3d 598.

72 citing documents.

Simms v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Simms v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co. of Ariz. -01, ¶ 9 (2012) (“[A] case becomes moot when an event occurs which would cause the outcome of the appeal to have no practical effect on the parties.”) (quoting Sedona Private Prop.
Edmonds v. 9540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Edmonds v. 9540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2012).
Spector v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Spector v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co., ¶¶ 10- 11 (2012) (a proper notice of sale requires only a mailing of the notice to interested parties); -16, ¶ 23 (2018) (exception to A.R.S.
Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 14 (2012).
Montelongo-Morales v. Driscoll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Montelongo-Morales v. Driscoll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. of Ariz., -01, ¶ 9 (2012) (quoting Sedona Private Prop.
Jp Morgan v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jp Morgan v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2012).
Bornstein v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
US Bank v. Reynolds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
US Bank v. Reynolds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2012).
Bornstein v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., ¶¶ 10–11 (2012) (applying § 33-811(C)).
Bramnick v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Bramnick v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., ¶¶ 12-14 (2012).
State v. Az Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Az Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., -01, ¶ 9 (2012) (quoting Sedona Private Prop.
Desert Financial v. Doss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desert Financial v. Doss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., -01, ¶ 9 (2012).
Lynaugh v. Bmo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lynaugh v. Bmo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 10 (2012) (“Under this statute, a person who has defenses or objections to a properly noticed trustee’s sale has one avenue for challenging the sale: filing for injunctive relief.”) (emphasis added); Steinberger v. McVey ex rel.
HSBC v. Van Buren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
HSBC v. Van Buren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Ariz., –01, ¶ 9 (2012).
Song He v. Coles Properties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Song He v. Coles Properties Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 14 (2012)
Spyropoulos v. Sherman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Spyropoulos v. Sherman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 9 (2012) (quotations omitted).
Capital Fund v. Sakthiveil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Capital Fund v. Sakthiveil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 9 (2012) (quotation omitted).
Miller Designs v. US Bank 418 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Miller Designs v. US Bank 418 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 9 (2012)); Manicom v. CitiMortgage, Inc., ¶¶ 8−9 (App. 2014) (“[T]he Arizona’s Deeds of Trust Act, A.R.S.
Maria Carmen Zubia v. David Shapiro Ariz. 2018
Maria Carmen Zubia v. David Shapiro Ariz. 2018
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 9 (2012) ( ¶ 4 (2011)).
Ornstein v. Bank of America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ornstein v. Bank of America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2012), as well as “claims that are dependent on the sale.” Morgan AZ Fin., –24, ¶ 7 (App. 2014).
Ekweani v. Citimortgage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ekweani v. Citimortgage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., ¶¶ 9-11 (2012); ¶ 15 (App. 2012).
First United v. Four Corners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
First United v. Four Corners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 9 (2012).
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
15 JP MORGAN v. MGM, et al. Decision of the Court retroactively change the first lien priority of the WaMu DOT or resurrect the extinguished Popple DOT.20 ¶38 Appellants argue that MGM was nonetheless entitled to judgment in its favor based on the principles stated in BT Capital, P.3d 598 (2012).
Markham Contracting Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Co. 379 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Markham Contracting Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Co. 379 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fnma v. Hamilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fnma v. Hamilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 10 (2012); see also A.R.S.
Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co. of Ariz., ¶ 10, A.R.S.