Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Coleman v. City of Mesa, 284 P.3d 863.

659 citing documents.

Boswell v. Fintelmann 392 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 12-2603, Romero v. Hasan, __ Ariz. __, __, ¶ 6, (-56, ¶ 7, -67 (2012)), because a claimant’s failure to properly certify the non-frivolous nature of the complaint pursuant to A.R.S.
Caravetta v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Caravetta v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Romero, 338 P.3d at 23, ¶ 6 (-56, ¶ 7 (2012)).
Sussex v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sussex v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
DISCUSSION ¶7 We review the dismissal of a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) de novo and “assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences from those facts.” ¶ 9 (2012).
Cutter v. Crowninshield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cutter v. Crowninshield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 17 (App. 2014) (-56, ¶¶ 7-8 (2012)).
Hayward v. Arizona Central Credit Union 387 P.3d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Hayward v. Arizona Central Credit Union 387 P.3d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Emerson v. O'connor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Romero v. Hasan 388 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Romero v. Hasan 388 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Emerson v. O'connor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Novak v. Maricopa Cty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Novak v. Maricopa Cty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shubhrananda v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shubhrananda v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
First United v. Four Corners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ainbinder v. Bodinet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
First United v. Four Corners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dismissal of Counterclaims ¶17 Appellants next challenge the dismissal of their counterclaims for wrongful foreclosure and racketeering.3 We review the superior court’s ruling de novo and will affirm only if Appellants “would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts susceptible of proof.” ¶ 8 (2012), quoting Fid.
Ainbinder v. Bodinet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Valenzuela v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Valenzuela v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stauffer v. Premier Service Mortgage, LLC 382 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Greenwood v. Block Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stauffer v. Premier Service Mortgage, LLC 382 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Greenwood v. Block Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. Navarro 377 P.3d 988 Ariz. 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
2 MATTISON v. SCOTTSDALE et al. Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a trial court’s dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim de novo.3 -56, ¶¶ 7- 8 (2012).
Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. Navarro 377 P.3d 988 Ariz. 2016
Timeless v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Timeless v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We review the denial of a motion for a new trial for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 10, but we review de novo the court’s order dismissing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), – 56 ¶ 7, –67 (2012).
Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Zeman v. Baumkirchner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016