Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Coleman v. City of Mesa, 284 P.3d 863.

659 citing documents.

Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beres v. Beres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beres v. Beres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 7, (reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion de novo); -69, ¶ 13, - 07 (App. 2009) (noting that law interpreting other statewide rules is applicable when “the language of the family law rules is substantially the same”).
Lemad v. Miravista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lemad v. Miravista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
–56, ¶¶ 7–8, –67 (2012) (internal citation omitted).
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Café Valley, Inc. v. Navidi 330 P.3d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Café Valley, Inc. v. Navidi 330 P.3d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. 326 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. 326 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hannosh v. Segal 328 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hannosh v. Segal 328 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 9, (“A complaint’s exhibits, or public records regarding matters referenced in a complaint, are not ‘outside the pleading,’ and courts may consider such documents without converting a Rule 12(b)(6) motion into a summary judgment motion.”(citation omitted)).
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 46, (“In adjudicating a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, however, a court does not resolve factual disputes between the parties on an undeveloped record.
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
U-Haul v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Jimenez v. state/ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jimenez v. state/ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Callies v. United Heritage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cooper v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cooper v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Steinberger v. McVey 318 P.3d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Steinberger v. McVey 318 P.3d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor., Inc., ¶ 8 , -56, ¶ 7 , -67 (2012).
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Karl v. US Bank National Ass'n 308 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Karl v. US Bank National Ass'n 308 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Blankenbaker v. Marks 299 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Blankenbaker v. Marks 299 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 7 , N. Peak Constr., LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd., , 57 13
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013