Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Coleman v. City of Mesa, 284 P.3d 863.
- Baron v. Honorhealth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Best v. Holliday Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Best v. Holliday Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Depetris v. Amelio Enterprises Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Depetris v. Amelio Enterprises Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Muscat v. creative/akande Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Muscat v. creative/akande
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“In determining if a complaint states a claim on which relief can be granted, courts must assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences from those facts, but mere conclusory statements are insufficient.” ¶ 9 (2012).
- Swift v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Swift v. Ador
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co., (statutory interpretation); ¶ 7 (2012) (motion to dismiss).
- Marceaux v. Tiffany & Bosco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Marceaux v. Tiffany & Bosco
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶6 The superior court’s ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo, -56, ¶ 7 (2012), and the motion is granted if the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
- Jaffe v. Legacy Partners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jaffe v. Legacy Partners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bayley v. Weiger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bayley v. Weiger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Camboni v. Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Camboni v. Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Seldin v. Seldin Dev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Seldin v. Seldin Dev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Novak v. Fountain Hills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Novak v. Fountain Hills
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
2 NOVAK v. FOUNTAIN HILLS Decision of the Court susceptible of proof.” -56, ¶¶ 7-8 (2012) (citing Fid.
- O'Neal v. Corporation Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- O'Neal v. Corporation Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Slater v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Slater v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Premium Leaf v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Premium Leaf v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Carlson v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Carlson v. Phillips
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 8 (2012) (citation omitted).
- Nationstar v. Magnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Nationstar v. Magnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Foss v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Chavez v. Roosevelt School Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Foss v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Chavez v. Roosevelt School
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶¶ 7–8 (2012); ¶ 7 (App. 2008).
- Marceaux v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Marceaux v. Baker
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 8 (2012) (citation omitted).
- True North v. Lai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- True North v. Lai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Brush & Nib v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2019
-
Brush & Nib v. City of Phoenix
Ariz. 2019
See, ¶ 36 n.5 (2012) (stating that article 2, section 6 “is in some respects more protective of free speech rights than the First Amendment”); Stummer, 219 Ariz. at 143 ¶ 17 (“We have also stated that [a]rticle 2, [s]ection 6 has ‘greater scope than the [F]irst [A]mendment.’” (citation omitted)); Mountain States Tel.
- Best v. Ceja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Best v. Ceja Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Rose v. Evers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Rose v. Evers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Dignity Health v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Ariz. 444 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019