Cited by

v. Ducey, ¶ 16 (2013) (stating that “one legislature may not enact a statute that irrevocably binds successor legislatures”).

v. Ducey, ¶ 2 (2013) (noting that the Revenue Control Limit is “a budget expenditure limit used to calculate the amount of certain state funds provided to school districts”); see A.R.S.

v. Ducey, ¶ 26 (2013) (quoting Arnold v. Ariz. Dep’t of Health Servs., ).

V. Ducey, –8 ¶¶ 24–25 (2013).

v. Ducey, ¶ 26 (2013) (quoting Arnold v. Ariz. Dep’t of Health Servs., (internal quotation marks omitted)).

v. Ducey, ¶ 8 (2013) (“The legislature and electorate ‘share lawmaking power under Arizona’s system of government.’” (quoting Ariz. Early Childhood Dev.

v. Ducey, ¶ 8 (2013) (“The legislature and electorate ‘share lawmaking power under Arizona’s system of government.’” (quoting Ariz. Early Childhood Dev.

v. Ducey, ¶ 21 (2013) (internal quotation omitted).

v. Ducey, 7 STATE V. ZEITNER Opinion of the Court ¶ 24 (2013) (citing UNUM Life Ins.

v. Ducey , , 5 ¶ 11, , 1156 (2013).

v. Ducey, ¶ 8 (2013) (citation omitted).

v. Ducey, -7, ¶ 21 (2013)).

v. Ducey, ¶ 11 (2013); see also Hall v. Elected Officials Ret.