Cited by

§ 12-2101(A)(1); ¶ 12 (2014).

¶ 12 (2014) (stating that rulings on the merits that include Rule 78(b) language are appealable even if attorney fees are unresolved).

¶ 12 (2014) (stating that rulings on the merits that include Rule 78(b) language are appealable even if attorney fees are unresolved).

¶ 12 (2014) (“[F]amily courts can avoid unwarranted delay by requiring parties to submit fee applications within a defined time period .

¶ 8 (2014) (stating that "absent Rule 78(B) language determining there is no just reason for delay and directing entry of final judgment, a judgment that does not dispose of a request for attorneys' fees is not final for purposes of appeal").

¶ 8 (2014) (holding a judgment that does not dispose of a request for attorneys’ fees is not final for purposes of appeal unless it contains Rule 78(B) language determining there is no just reason for delay and directing entry of final judgment).

¶ 12 (2014) (“[F]amily courts can avoid unwarranted delay by requiring parties to submit fee applications within a defined time period .

¶ 12, our supreme court held that a post-decree order resolving all issues except the request for attorneys’ fees was not final because the order did not include a ruling on attorneys’ fees or certify the order as final under Rule 78(B).

See, ¶ 6 (2014); ¶ 5 (App. 2012).

See, , 341 ¶ 6, , In re Marriage of Johnson & Gravino, , 230 ¶ 5

¶ 1 (2014) (holding that an otherwise appealable judgment was not final for purposes of appeal if an issue of attorneys’ fees was left undecided and the court had not included language from Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 78(B) certifying the order was final for purposes of appeal).4 Marc’s notice of appeal

edures 78(B) provides that “a claim for attorneys’ fees may be considered a separate claim from the related judgment regarding the merits of a cause.” Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the counterpart to Rule 78(B), “prohibits the entry of final judgment absent a determination of all issues, including attorneys’ fees, except upon express direction from the trial court.” ¶ 8 (2014).