Cited by

To the contrary, Arizona’s interpretive canons directs the court to “attempt to reconcile and give effect to all terms of the contract to avoid any term being rendered superfluous.” ¶ 14 (2020).

¶ 14 (2020) (“When interpreting a contract, we seek to discover and effectuate the parties’ expressed intent” and “we consider a provision’s meaning in the context of the entire contract.”).

Gilmore, 258 Ariz. at 42, ¶ 16 (summary judgment); ¶ 13 (2020) (contract interpretation).

¶ 14 (2020) (“[W]e attempt to reconcile and give effect to all terms of the contract to avoid any term being rendered superfluous.”).

In interpreting a contract, courts “seek to discover and effectuate the parties’ expressed intent.” ¶ 14 (2020).

-50, ¶ 14 (2020) (attempting to “give effect to all terms of the contract to avoid any term being rendered superfluous”).

Further, wherever possible, we “attempt to reconcile and give effect to all terms of the contract to avoid any term being rendered superfluous.” ¶ 14 (2020) (as amended).

¶12 In interpreting a contract, we consider the language used according to its plain and ordinary meaning, viewed in context of the entire contract, unless “it can be shown that the parties intended a special meaning.” ¶ 14 (2020).

We glean the meaning “from the whole contract,” Climate Control, aspiring to “reconcile and give effect to all terms of the contract to avoid any term being rendered superfluous,” 9 14 (2020).

¶ 14 (2020) (“[W]e consider a provision’s meaning in the context of the entire contract.”).

¶13 This interpretation also tracks the title of the subsection in which the provision is found, “Service Interruptions: Limitations on Liability of Company.” And though APS argues that the title of the heading is not part of the term itself, “we consider a provision’s meaning in the context of the entire contract.” ¶ 14 (2020).

Arizona courts interpret contract “provisions according to their plain and ordinary meaning” and “in the context of the entire contract.” -50, ¶ 14 (2020) (quoting Climate Control, ) (“A clause in a contract, if taken by itself, often admits of two meanings, when from the whole contract there is no reasonable doubt as to the sense in which the parties use it.”).

unless it can be shown that the parties intended a special meaning,” ¶ 14 (2020) (citations omitted).

to avoid any term being rendered superfluous.” ¶ 14 (2020) (citation omitted)).