Cited by

Co., (recognizing “issues of ‘general statewide significance’ are an 3 PETERSON v. ACC, et al. Decision of the Court exception to the general rule that an appellate court will not consider issues not raised in th

Co., (severity of harm relevant factor in awarding punitive damages).

Co., (“Obviously, the goals of punishment and deterrence would be circumvented if the financial position of the defendant allowed it to comfortably absorb the award.”).

Co., (noting that when the defendant "did not deny its acts nor allege that they were unintentional," testimony of past practices was still "relevant and admissible to prove [defendant's] improper motives").

Co., (recognizing that generally, “an appellate court will not consider issues not raised in the 4 GRAVES v. SLAWSON Decision of the Court trial court”).

Co., (noting arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including constitutional challenges, may be waived).

Co., (noting arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including constitutional challenges, may be waived).

Co., (arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including constitutional challenges, may be waived).

Co., (“[A]n appellate court will not consider issues not raised in the trial court.”); Cont’l Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utils., LLC, ¶ 12 (App. 2011) (same).

Co., (stating the Court may hear issues though they were not properly raised but declining to exercise that power).

Co., (explaining that relevancy is a two-part test requiring that the evidence relate to a consequential fact placed at issue from “the pleadings and substantive law” and “alter the [fact’s] probability, not prove or disprove [its] existence”).

Co. , , 503, , 1086 (1987).

There, the supreme court affirmed the jury’s punitive damages award where Allstate had a “policy of routine, automatic deductions, regardless of their validity, in valuing an insured’s loss.”

Co., (stating a defendant’s concealment of his misconduct is relevant to the determination of punitive damages); Nardelli v. Metro.