Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance, 733 P.2d 1073.

198 citing documents.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court 804 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court 804 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Contrary to [defendant’s] argument, , [, cert.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
Co., , , (punitive damages available when defendant’s wrongful conduct was guided by “evil motives”).
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Gonzales v. Arizona Public Service Co. 775 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Gonzales v. Arizona Public Service Co. 775 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Contrary to Mitchell’s argument, , does not require specific proof of Mitchell’s “wealth, property, income, education, earning capacity, debts, savings, or credit.” The plaintiff, in a punitive damages case, need only introduce evidence sufficient to allow the trier of fact to calculate an award that is reasonable under the circu
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co., , , , , cert.
Barsema v. Susong 751 P.2d 969 Ariz. 1988
Barsema v. Susong 751 P.2d 969 Ariz. 1988
Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc. 748 P.2d 1191 Ariz. 1987
Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc. 748 P.2d 1191 Ariz. 1987
Snow v. Snow 745 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gatecliff v. Great Republic Life Insurance 744 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gatecliff v. Great Republic Life Insurance 744 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , 495 n. 3, , 1078 n. 3 (1987).
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
see Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
Sellers v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY. 742 P.2d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Sellers v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY. 742 P.2d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , 495 n. 3, , 1078 n. 3 (1987).
Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Willow Creek Leasing, Inc. v. Bartzen 742 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , we find no reversible error in the instant case.
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
Co., Inc., , (consideration of constitutional issue raised for the first time on appeal is discretionary).
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance 764 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance 764 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co. 734 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Filasky v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance 734 P.2d 76 Ariz. 1987
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co. 734 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
See, , (pattern of dishonest or fraudulent conduct); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 comment c (1979) (punitive damages appropriate “when a tort ...
Filasky v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance 734 P.2d 76 Ariz. 1987
-505 , -1088 (1987), we limited this portion of Linthicum to prospective application.