Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co., 745 P.2d 85.

29 citing documents.

Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Supply Co., - 32 (1987) (“Mark Lighting II”); (treating a judgment’s silence on a fee request as implicitly denying it).
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Supply Co., and they do not extend the time for an appeal
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
(declining to resolve “whether attorneys’ fees may be awarded under A.R.S.
Britt v. Steffen 205 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Britt v. Steffen 205 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Reymundo F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Reymundo F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Supply Co., 31, 89 (1987) (dismissal without prejudice procedurally appealable); Filer v. Tohono O’Odham Nation Gaming Enter., (same).
National Broker Associates, Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. 119 P.3d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
National Broker Associates, Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. 119 P.3d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sanders v. Foley 945 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sanders v. Foley 945 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Supply Co., -32 , -90 (1987) (assuming post-judgment motion for attorneys’ fees could be treated as a motion to amend the judgment, it was filed on the 28th day after entry of judgment and was therefore untimely), and our recent decision in Monti v. Monti , (post-judgment aw
Guardianship of Monti v. Monti 924 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Guardianship of Monti v. Monti 924 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Declining to follow Hamm v. Y & M Enterprises, Inc., , , governs all claims for attorneys’ fees in Arizona, unless a rule of procedure or a statute otherwise provides.
PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc. 877 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc. 877 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Supply Co., -2 , 90 (1987).
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Supply Co., , Hawkins, 152 Ariz. at 504 , 733 P.2d at 1087 ; , Chevron Chem.
Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Rice 781 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Rice 781 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Mark Lighting Fixture Co.
Hamm v. Y & M Enterprises, Inc. 757 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Hamm v. Y & M Enterprises, Inc. 757 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Two Arizona cases have discussed the applicability, of Rule 59 to requests for attorney’s fees: Mark Lighting Fixture Co., , and Title Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co., Inc.
Harris v. Reserve Life Insurance 762 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Harris v. Reserve Life Insurance 762 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Mark Lighting Fixture Company, , , vacated on other grounds
Snow v. Snow 745 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987