Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., 755 P.2d 1135.

62 citing documents.

Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 28-909(A)(1) (requiring “[e]ach front seat occupant of a motor vehicle” to “[h]ave the lap and shoulder belt properly adjusted and fastened while the vehicle is in motion”); (recognizing “the seat belt defense as a matter which the jury may consider in apportioning damages due to the ‘fault’ of the plaintiff”).
In re the Marriage of Friedman 397 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Carranza v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carranza v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Law v. Superior Court (Harder)
Jackson White v. Dos Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jackson White v. Dos Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ct., (applying this rule).
Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“Unless otherwise specified, Arizona appellate opinions in civil cases operate both retroactively and prospectively.”
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc. 271 P.3d 1104 Ariz. 2012
the legislature may regulate common law tort actions as long as reasonable legal redress remains available for those claiming injury, see id., the Constitution imposes no greater restriction when this Court exercises its “obligation to participate in the evolution of tort law so that it may reflect societal and technological changes,”
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 258 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
In any event, our supreme court has made clear that “[ujnless otherwise specified, Arizona appellate opinions in civil eases operate both retroactively and prospectively.” , see also Taylor v. Travelers Indem.
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co. of Am., (“‘Unless otherwise specified, Arizona appellate opinions in civil cases operate both retroactively and prospectively.’”)
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 174 P.3d 270 Ariz. 2008
at 321 ¶ 30, 9 P.3d at 1060 ( ).
Hutto v. Francisco 107 P.3d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Hutto v. Francisco 107 P.3d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
“As a general rule, a motorist is simply better off wearing a seat belt.”
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
See Cronin, , Wagenseller, 147 Ariz. at 376-81 , 710 P.2d at 1031-36 ; -56 , -44 (1988)
Hause v. City of Tucson 19 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Hause v. City of Tucson 19 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
(“[The] delay in the effective date of legislation provides ...
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
§ 12-2505(A) (comparative negligence reduces damages proportionate to degree of fault); , (same); see generally Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co., , (contributory negligence not submitted to jury unless defendant’s negligence first shown).
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
“Unless otherwise specified, Arizona appellate opinions in civil cases operate both retroactively and prospectively.”
Garcia v. General Motors Corp. 990 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Garcia v. General Motors Corp. 990 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
10 Although the judiciary “has an obligation to participate in the evolution of tort law so that it may reflect societal and technological changes,” , if factual varia *150 tions may produce inequities under the current comparative fault system, the legislature, not the judiciary, should address any necessary changes in this particular area.
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
A person injured by another’s negligence cannot recover for losses due to “avoidable consequences.” William L. Prosser and W. Page Keeton, The Law of Torts, § 65, at page 458 (5th ed. 1984) (-46 , -34 (App.1986), approved in part, , ).
Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. 893 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. 893 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-65 , -17 (App.1988) (supp. *37 opinion) (“ ‘[UJnless otherwise specified, Arizona appellate opinions in civil cases operate both retroactively and prospectively.’ ”) ( , (supp. opinion)).
Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of Regents 866 P.2d 1330 Ariz. 1994
Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of Regents 866 P.2d 1330 Ariz. 1994
(“[Tjhis court has an obligation to participate in the evolution of tort law so that it may reflect societal and technological changes.”) ( , ).
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
defendant argues that the jury should have been permitted to consider whether the victim’s failure to use a seat belt reduced the charged crime of aggravated assault, a class three felony, to simple assault, a misdemeanor.
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Nation v. Colla 841 P.2d 1370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Nation v. Colla 841 P.2d 1370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
mandate that Pritchard be given only prospective application.
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992