Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Schroeder v. Schroeder, 778 P.2d 1212.
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Abasciano v. Abasciano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Abasciano v. Abasciano
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Even so, the court appropriately explained in the decree that the purpose of spousal maintenance is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
- Hendershot v. Whyte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Hendershot v. Whyte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Whalen v. Whalen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Whalen v. Whalen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Lawless v. Olech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Lawless v. Olech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Neely v. Klingberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Neely v. Klingberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Schultz v. Schultz
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“[T]he current aim [of spousal maintenance awards] is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.
- Warner v. Driggs-Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Warner v. Driggs-Warner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
The purpose of spousal maintenance is to “achieve an independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the [spouse] requesting maintenance.”
- Tomsich v. Tomsich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Tomsich v. Tomsich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(noting that the “aim [of spousal maintenance] is to achieve independence for both parties”).
- Labarge v. Abdullahi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Labarge v. Abdullahi
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
The aim of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.” (1989); (recognizing that, whenever possible, an order for spousal maintenance “should promote a transition toward financial independence”).
- McCanless v. McCanless Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
McCanless v. McCanless
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 25-327(A); (“The question whether a substantial and continuing change in circumstances occurred .
- Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Svansdottir v. Johnsesn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Svansdottir v. Johnsesn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Andaloro v. Andaloro
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
As the superior court noted, the purpose of spousal maintenance is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
- Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Butler v. Butler
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
At the same time, the court should aim “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.” (“[M]aintenance orders, whenever possible, should promote a transition toward financial independence.”).
- Howitt v. Wrinkle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Howitt v. Wrinkle
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§§ 25-319(C), -327(A); Waldren, 217 Ariz. at 175, ¶ 9.
- Cleary v. Cordero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Cleary v. Cordero
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“If the purpose of spousal maintenance is rehabilitation, the duration of the award at the time of decree represents a prediction of when self- sufficiency will be accomplished.”).
- Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Schickner v. Schickner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
A. Changed Circumstances ¶24 The goal of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
- Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Coburn v. Rhodig
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Hayden, -27, ¶ 17, -21 (2005); ).
- Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Marriage of Ames v. Ames 370 P.3d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Marriage of Ames v. Ames
370 P.3d 115
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(explaining the purpose of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance”); -04 (App. 1993) (recognizing that public policy favors limiting the duration of spousal m
- Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Bourke v. Bourke
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(describing the goal of rehabilitative support as to achieve financial independence for both parties).
- Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Vogue v. Maleknia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(affirming an award of spousal maintenance for an indefinite term to a wife who had found only non- lucrative work and whose expenses had increased to include chemotherapy treatment for cancer).
- Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶5 The purpose of a spousal maintenance award is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”