Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schroeder v. Schroeder, 778 P.2d 1212.

74 citing documents.

  • Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Featherston v. Featherston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Abasciano v. Abasciano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Abasciano v. Abasciano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    Even so, the court appropriately explained in the decree that the purpose of spousal maintenance is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
  • Hendershot v. Whyte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Hendershot v. Whyte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Whalen v. Whalen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Whalen v. Whalen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Lawless v. Olech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Lawless v. Olech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Neely v. Klingberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Neely v. Klingberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (“[T]he current aim [of spousal maintenance awards] is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.
  • Warner v. Driggs-Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Warner v. Driggs-Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    The purpose of spousal maintenance is to “achieve an independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the [spouse] requesting maintenance.”
  • Tomsich v. Tomsich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Tomsich v. Tomsich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (noting that the “aim [of spousal maintenance] is to achieve independence for both parties”).
  • Labarge v. Abdullahi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Labarge v. Abdullahi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    The aim of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.” (1989); (recognizing that, whenever possible, an order for spousal maintenance “should promote a transition toward financial independence”).
  • McCanless v. McCanless Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • McCanless v. McCanless Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    § 25-327(A); (“The question whether a substantial and continuing change in circumstances occurred .
  • Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Fogerson v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Svansdottir v. Johnsesn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Svansdottir v. Johnsesn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    As the superior court noted, the purpose of spousal maintenance is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
  • Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Butler v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    At the same time, the court should aim “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.” (“[M]aintenance orders, whenever possible, should promote a transition toward financial independence.”).
  • Howitt v. Wrinkle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Howitt v. Wrinkle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    §§ 25-319(C), -327(A); Waldren, 217 Ariz. at 175, ¶ 9.
  • Cleary v. Cordero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Cleary v. Cordero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    (“If the purpose of spousal maintenance is rehabilitation, the duration of the award at the time of decree represents a prediction of when self- sufficiency will be accomplished.”).
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    A. Changed Circumstances ¶24 The goal of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”
  • Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    v. Hayden, -27, ¶ 17, -21 (2005); ).
  • Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Nia v. Nia 396 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Marriage of Ames v. Ames 370 P.3d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Marriage of Ames v. Ames 370 P.3d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (explaining the purpose of spousal maintenance “is to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance”); -04 (App. 1993) (recognizing that public policy favors limiting the duration of spousal m
  • Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (describing the goal of rehabilitative support as to achieve financial independence for both parties).
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (affirming an award of spousal maintenance for an indefinite term to a wife who had found only non- lucrative work and whose expenses had increased to include chemotherapy treatment for cancer).
  • Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶5 The purpose of a spousal maintenance award is “to achieve independence for both parties and to require an effort toward independence by the party requesting maintenance.”